Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's mobile website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 20, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 A and AA ComplianceScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsKeyboard Focus Order IssuesInaccessible Error Identification

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on December 20, 2022, against a restaurant chain operating a mobile website. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible, preventing her from independently using its services.

The complaint specifically alleges multiple violations of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. These include Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to unlabeled icons in the reservation form, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) preventing date selection with screen readers, Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose in context) due to an unlabeled main menu icon, Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) for unclear error messages for screen reader users, and Guideline 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion) for not announcing field labels in the private event booking form.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses in the hospitality industry, particularly restaurants, that offer online services through mobile websites. Failure to ensure full accessibility for visually impaired individuals under ADA Title III, including compliance with WCAG standards, can lead to federal lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate inaccessible digital platforms, and the recovery of attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant's mobile website accused of?

The mobile website is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, including issues with Information and Relationships (1.3.1), Focus Order (2.4.3), Link Purpose (2.4.4), Error Identification (3.3.1), and Error Suggestion (3.3.3), leading to screen reader incompatibility.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other restaurant businesses with mobile websites that fail to provide full accessibility for visually impaired users under ADA Title III, potentially leading to similar lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and financial penalties for non-compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's mobile web.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer