Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 27, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1.1 KeyboardWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 3.3.3 Error SuggestionWCAG 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks

Case Summary

Alejandro Espinoza, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on December 27, 2022, against an online clothing retailer. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website fails to comply with ADA Title III regulations, specifically impacting visually impaired users who rely on screen reader software.

The lawsuit details several WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including the absence of audibly rendered messages and error suggestions, filter modals that lack keyboard operability focus, buttons and links without contextual audible labels, prices not audibly indicating discounts, focusable components receiving focus out of order, and the lack of a 'Bypass Blocks' mechanism on the cart page. Additionally, the plaintiff claims a pop-up notice for the cookie policy was not audibilized, leading to a trespass claim.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for similar businesses that operate e-commerce websites if their digital platforms do not provide full and equal access to all individuals with disabilities. Ensuring comprehensive WCAG compliance is crucial to avoid potential lawsuits under ADA Title III and related common law claims.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

This online clothing retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including: messages not audibly rendered, filter modals lacking keyboard operability focus, functionality not operable via keyboard, buttons with no contextual audible labels, prices lacking audible discount indicators, focus order issues, absence of a 'Bypass Blocks' mechanism, unaudible date of birth labels, and unaudible error suggestions.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Alejandro Espinoza filed this lawsuit, and is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other e-commerce websites and online businesses, as it underscores the importance of digital accessibility under ADA Title III. Failing to ensure websites are fully accessible to disabled users can lead to similar lawsuits, demanding injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer