Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 27, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard Operability FailureWCAG 3.3.2 Missing/Incomplete Audible LabelsWCAG 3.3.2 Ambiguous Price IndicationWCAG 3.3.2 Inaccurate Product DescriptionsWCAG 3.3.3 No Audible Error Suggestions

Case Summary

Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online clothing and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 27, 2022. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, and damages for digital accessibility barriers.

The lawsuit details multiple Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A violations, including keyboard navigation failures for cookie consent toggles, missing audible labels for selected filter options, unclear audible labels for discounted prices, incorrect audible color labels for products, and lack of audible labels for selected sizes. Additionally, it cites a failure in focus order for the shopping cart modal, insufficient audible labels for delivery method options, and a lack of audible error suggestions for incorrect gift card and credit card inputs during checkout.

This action highlights significant legal risks for e-commerce websites that fail to implement effective communication and equal access for visually impaired users. Businesses operating online retail platforms are exposed to similar lawsuits if their digital properties do not adhere to WCAG standards, potentially leading to court-ordered injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees to ensure full compliance with ADA Title III.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including the toggle button for cookie consent not being operable by keyboard, absence of audible labels for selected filter options, similar audible labels for original and discounted prices, incorrect audible color labels (all described as black), no audible label for selected product sizes, shopping cart modal not receiving keyboard focus, incomplete audible labels for delivery methods, and missing audible error suggestions for incorrect gift card and credit card inputs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for other online retailers regarding their compliance with ADA Title III, specifically concerning website accessibility for visually impaired individuals. Failure to meet WCAG standards can result in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and orders to implement comprehensive accessibility policies, testing, and training.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and ac.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer