Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's mobile website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 28, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 Level A and AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard NavigationForm Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida Miami Division on December 28, 2022, against a restaurant's mobile website for alleged accessibility barriers. The complaint, brought by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, asserts that the digital platform fails to provide equal access for visually impaired users by not properly interacting with screen reader software.

The lawsuit alleges multiple violations of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. Specifically, the mobile website reportedly violates Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) with misleading logo descriptions, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to non-sequential focus order and unlabeled images in data tables, and Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) which prevents proper use of the reservation date picker. Further issues include Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) with unlabeled elements on forms and Guideline 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion) for inadequate feedback on form submission, all of which hinder effective interaction with screen reader software.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for hospitality businesses that operate mobile websites and other digital platforms, emphasizing the critical need for compliance with ADA Title III and established accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA. Businesses must ensure their online services are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to avoid similar litigation and uphold equal access, even when using third-party vendor platforms.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant's mobile website accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for misleading logo descriptions, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for non-sequential focus and unlabeled images, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for issues in date pickers, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unlabeled form elements, and Guideline 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion) for poor form submission feedback.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal liability for businesses in the hospitality industry operating mobile websites that are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, especially regarding screen reader compatibility and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA compliance under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant's mobile web.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer