Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 5, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 F65WCAG 2.0 A.3.3.2WCAG 2.0 A 2.4.3WCAG 2.1 A 4.11WCAG 2.1 A F15

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has initiated an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion retailer, alleging digital barriers that prevent full and equal access for visually impaired users. The complaint was filed in the Southern District of Florida on January 5, 2023, seeking permanent injunctive relief to ensure the digital platform complies with federal accessibility standards.

The lawsuit specifically details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations on the retailer's website, including mislabeled images lacking accessible names (WCAG 2.0 F65), failure to announce "Please select a size" and provide labels for user input (WCAG 2.0 A.3.3.2), an inaccessible "Find a Store" field due to missing focus order (WCAG 2.0 A 2.4.3), and the use of duplicate IDs on product image elements (WCAG 2.1 A 4.11). Further allegations include skipped and unannounced prices before adding items to the bag (WCAG 2.1 A F15), hindering product comparison, and visual labels not appearing in the accessible names of links and controls (WCAG 2.0 A F96).

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that do not integrate robust accessibility features from design through maintenance. The plaintiff's intent to continue accessing the website underscores the need for proactive remediation to ensure digital environments provide effective communication and equal access, preventing potential litigation for other online retailers facing similar accessibility challenges.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of mislabeled images lacking accessible names, failure to announce size selection and provide input labels, an inaccessible "Find a Store" field due to missing focus order, duplicate IDs on product images, skipped prices before purchase, and visual labels not appearing in accessible names of links and controls.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm represents the plaintiff?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, and she is represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create for other e-commerce businesses?

This case highlights the significant legal risk for e-commerce businesses if their websites fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for discrimination and demands for injunctive relief to remediate digital accessibility barriers.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer