Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 9, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 Level A and AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing LabelsIllogical Focus OrderKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against a restaurant operator in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 9, 2023. The complaint, brought under ADA Title III, alleges that the mobile website is not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, specifically those using screen reader software, thereby denying them equal access to the establishment's services.

The lawsuit, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC, details specific violations of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. These include Guideline 1.3.1, where icons in the reservation form are unlabeled, requiring excessive swipes and lacking meaningful labels for screen reader users. Guideline 1.3.2 is violated due to an illogical focus order in the beverage menu, presenting product names and alcohol percentages separately without context. Furthermore, Guideline 2.4.3 is cited as the focus order in the reservation form is broken, preventing screen reader users from selecting a date as focus prematurely shifts away from the date picker.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for businesses, especially those in the hospitality industry that offer online services like menus and reservations, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Non-compliance can lead to litigation, demand for injunctive relief, and the necessity to implement corrective procedures to make online services accessible to all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant operator accused of?

The restaurant operator is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, including Guideline 1.3.1 for unlabeled elements and excessive swipes in the reservation form, Guideline 1.3.2 for an illogical focus order in the beverage menu, and Guideline 2.4.3 for a broken focus order in the date picker of the reservation form.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for businesses, particularly in the hospitality sector, that fail to ensure their mobile websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to costly litigation and demands for injunctive relief under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant operator. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer