Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Linen Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 11, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Focus ManagementDynamic Content Accessibility

Case Summary

Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on January 11, 2023, against an online luxury linen retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit details several alleged WCAG violations, including product images that are mislabeled or lack meaningful descriptions, hindering screen reader users. The store locator page reportedly lacks proper focus management, preventing screen readers from accessing store addresses. Furthermore, dynamic elements such as "Add to Bag" pop-up windows are not announced, leaving users unaware of interactions. The site also allegedly uses duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.1A H71) and skips item prices on product pages, failing to provide essential alt attributes and focus (WCAG 2.1A F89).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for e-commerce platforms and online retailers that fail to design, build, and maintain their digital properties to be fully accessible and independently usable by individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating websites with similar accessibility barriers under ADA Title III provisions may face similar injunctive relief lawsuits, demanding website modifications and policy changes to ensure equal access and effective communication.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury linen retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of mislabeled product images, screen reader incompatibility on the store locator page (lack of focus on addresses), unannounced pop-up windows (e.g., "Add to Bag"), use of duplicate IDs (WCAG 2.1A H71), and skipped item prices on product pages (WCAG 2.1A F89) due to missing alt attributes and focus.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for online retailers and e-commerce platforms that do not provide accessible websites for visually impaired users. Such businesses risk facing ADA Title III lawsuits demanding significant website modifications, auxiliary aids, and services to ensure effective communication and equal access for all users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Luxury Linen Retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer