Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 25, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextDuplicate IDsKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnannounced Pop-upsEmpty Button Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on January 25, 2023, against an online fashion retailer. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to the retailer's inaccessible website, which prevents visually impaired users from full and equal enjoyment of its services.

The lawsuit details several specific accessibility barriers. These include images lacking description labels (ID-ALT) or having duplicate ID-descriptions, crucial product information like prices being skipped by screen readers on product pages, links and buttons without announced names, and empty button elements. Furthermore, pop-up windows, such as the "Add to Bag" confirmation, are not announced to screen reader users, and some JavaScript elements that function as links cannot be navigated via keyboard or read by screen readers.

This action underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses, particularly e-commerce platforms, that fail to implement WCAG standards. Companies must prioritize digital accessibility to ensure their websites are usable by all consumers, including those with visual impairments, thereby mitigating the risk of ADA Title III litigation and demonstrating compliance with federal accessibility requirements.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of having images without description labels (ID-ALT) or with duplicate ID-descriptions, critical product information (like price) being skipped, links and buttons lacking announced names, empty button elements, and unannounced pop-up windows. Additionally, some JavaScript elements acting as links are not keyboard navigable or readable by screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses, especially those with e-commerce websites, that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer