Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 2, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureUnlabeled or Poorly Labeled Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online furniture retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated February 1, 2023. The complaint, brought by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., alleges discriminatory practices preventing visually disabled individuals from accessing the defendant's e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of its physical store.

The lawsuit details several alleged WCAG violations, including a mislabeled logo that fails to convey its purpose as a homepage link, product images with identical and uninformative descriptions, inaccessible product pricing, text that does not properly integrate with screen reader software (causing product names, prices, and descriptions to be skipped), and missing website navigation buttons for main content, menu, or footer sections. These barriers reportedly deny visually disabled users full and equal access to information and services.

This litigation highlights the significant legal risk for online businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites linked to brick-and-mortar stores, if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to disabled users. Businesses must ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher to avoid similar lawsuits, prevent continuous and ongoing harm to disabled individuals, and ensure inclusivity.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?

The online furniture retailer is accused of having a mislabeled logo acting as a homepage link, product images with identical and uninformative descriptions, inaccessible prices, text not integrating with screen reader software, and missing navigation buttons for main content, menu, or footer.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses, especially those with e-commerce platforms connected to physical stores, if their websites fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards, leading to potential injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer