Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and home goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 9, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Descriptive TextImproper LabelingKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an apparel and home goods retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on February 9, 2023.

The complaint alleges that the retailer's online platform contains numerous access barriers, preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from full and equal use. Specific violations cited include mislabeled business hours, an inaccessible carousel that fails to integrate with screen readers, general advertisements lacking descriptive text, and improperly labeled text that causes screen reader users' cursors to skip information. Furthermore, the defendant's accessibility statement itself was inaccessible, and the website reportedly does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating digital platforms that do not provide effective communication and equal access for individuals with visual disabilities. Companies in the retail sector and beyond must proactively ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and established web accessibility guidelines to avoid potential litigation and ensure inclusivity for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and home goods retailer accused of?

This retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including mislabeled business hours, an inaccessible carousel with information like price ranges, general advertisements lacking descriptive text, and improperly labeled text that causes screen reader navigation issues. The website's accessibility statement was also found to be inaccessible, and the platform reportedly fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a significant legal risk for other online retailers and businesses whose websites contain similar accessibility barriers. It underscores the importance of adhering to ADA Title III requirements and WCAG standards to ensure equal access for visually disabled users, thereby mitigating the risk of accessibility-related litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and home goods.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer