Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fast-Food Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 10, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled ButtonsShopping Cart AccessibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 10, 2023, against an online fast-food restaurant chain. The plaintiff, a visually disabled individual, alleges that the e-commerce website fails to provide full and equal access to disabled users, preventing effective communication and participation in online services.

The complaint specifically outlines several accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including a mislabeled home page button, lack of notifications or confirmations for items added to or removed from the shopping cart, and inaccessible price, subtotal, and estimated tax information within the shopping cart. Furthermore, the website reportedly fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA standards, lacks essential alt-text for graphics, and hinders keyboard navigation, thereby denying visually impaired users an equivalent online experience.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses, particularly those operating fast-food restaurants, that maintain websites lacking ADA compliance. The failure to implement proper accessibility features, such as those addressing screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation, exposes companies to litigation under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, emphasizing the need for comprehensive digital accessibility policies and testing.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fast-food restaurant chain accused of?

The restaurant chain is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, failing to provide notifications for shopping cart actions, presenting inaccessible price and tax information in the shopping cart, lacking alt-text for graphics, and having keyboard navigation issues, all contributing to a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit. He is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses, especially those in the fast-food industry with online presences, underscoring the necessity of ensuring their websites are fully accessible to disabled individuals. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to similar lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fast-Food Restaurant Ch.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer