Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Italian restaurant operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 13, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAFocus Order ViolationMissing Accessible Labels/InstructionsImages of TextScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an Italian restaurant operator in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on February 13, 2023. Ms. Lucius, who is legally blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the restaurant operator's mobile website is not accessible to visually impaired consumers.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations. These include Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order violation, where menu links are not announced to mobile screen reader users, popups are not announced, and focus moves incorrectly), Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions violation, where focus disappears after an accessibility icon and "Menu item" is announced repeatedly), Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text violation, where the catering menu is an image with no accessible alternative), and Guideline 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways violation, indicating a lack of alternative navigation methods like a site map, footer links, or search feature for menu items).

This case highlights the legal imperative for businesses operating places of public accommodation, such as restaurants, to ensure their digital platforms, including mobile websites, are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to litigation, requiring injunctive relief, and significant legal fees and costs for non-compliant entities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this Italian restaurant operator accused of?

The restaurant operator is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations, including Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order), Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text), and Guideline 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses, particularly places of public accommodation, that fail to ensure their mobile websites and other digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits and court-ordered remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Italian restaurant ope.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer