Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 21, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Accessibility FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityDuplicate IDsADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., filed an accessibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on February 21, 2023, against an online fashion retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The plaintiff, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual, claims the website has multiple barriers impeding screen-reader software. Specific violations include product images that are mislabeled or have identical descriptions, prices lacking focus on product pages, and unannounced pop-up windows for store locators. Additionally, the website's code reportedly conflicts with screen reader voices, causing interference, and several clickable controls are only accessible via mouse, with video controls also being inaccessible. The complaint also notes the presence of duplicate IDs on various elements.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal exposure for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to meet ADA Title III accessibility standards. Such entities risk injunctions requiring website modifications, auxiliary aids, and potentially substantial attorney's fees and costs, emphasizing the critical need for digital accessibility to ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

This online fashion retailer is accused of product images being mislabeled or having the same description, prices not having focus on product pages, unannounced pop-up windows, website code conflicting with screen reader voices, clickable controls only accessible by mouse, inaccessible video controls, and duplicate IDs on elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar e-commerce businesses of facing ADA Title III lawsuits, requiring costly website modifications, providing auxiliary aids, and incurring attorney's fees and litigation expenses due to digital accessibility failures.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fashion Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer