Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 2, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing LabelsMissing Alt Text on ImagesKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed a federal lawsuit on March 2, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint targets an online apparel and accessories retailer for alleged violations of ADA Title III regarding their e-commerce website.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including improperly labeled text and filters that prevent navigation, screen reader incompatibility with product image pricing distinctions, unlabeled multiple product images with insufficient descriptions, a mislabeled logo acting as a homepage link, and unlabeled shopping cart information regarding prices, discounts, and subtotals. Furthermore, the accessibility statement and widget/plugin provided by the defendant were found to be ineffective for visually disabled users.

This action underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce platforms in the retail sector, that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies with an online presence must proactively remediate digital accessibility barriers to avoid similar lawsuits, which can lead to costly legal fees, court-ordered injunctions, and reputational damage.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The website is accused of having improperly labeled text, filters that do not explain options, unclear pricing distinctions for screen readers on product images, unlabeled multiple product images, a mislabeled logo link, and unlabeled shopping cart details. The accessibility statement and widget were also ineffective.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal risks, including potential litigation under ADA Title III, for retail businesses whose websites do not provide full and equal access to visually disabled users, highlighting the necessity of digital accessibility compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel and access.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer