Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 7, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled NavigationLack of Feedback for User Actions

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza has initiated a federal lawsuit against an apparel retailer in the Southern District of Florida, with the complaint filed on March 7, 2023. The action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and damages for alleged unlawful disability discrimination under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), alongside claims for trespass.

The complaint specifically alleges that the e-commerce website contains numerous access barriers, rendering it inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users. Cited WCAG violations include product images with identical descriptions and inaccessible product names/pricing, improperly labeled shopping cart information (item name, price, size, color) that does not integrate with screen readers, product colors read without descriptions, a lack of confirmation after removing items from the shopping cart, and a mislabeled logo that fails to convey its purpose as a homepage link to screen readers. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks an accessibility notice, policy, or statement and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses operating online platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III digital accessibility requirements. Such non-compliance can lead to claims for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and costs, highlighting the ongoing necessity for all public accommodations to ensure their digital assets are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel retailer accused of?

The lawsuit alleges issues such as product images lacking unique descriptions and inaccessible pricing, improperly labeled shopping cart elements, product colors without descriptions, lack of confirmation after removing items from the cart, and a mislabeled homepage logo. The website is also cited for not meeting WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards and lacking an accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit underscores the legal risk for online businesses that do not ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to claims for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and damages for non-compliance with ADA Title III and related common law torts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer