Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Lingerie and Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 8, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Accessible LabelsWCAG 2.0 Level AAADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 8, 2023, against an online lingerie and apparel retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users who rely on screen reader software.

The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers, including improperly labeled text and elements, cursor navigation issues, mislabeled product sizes, an unnavigable search bar (mislabeled as "scan off search edit space"), inaccessible product size and price information in the shopping cart, and lack of confirmation when removing items. Furthermore, the website lacks an accessibility notice or policy, does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, and the retailer has failed to implement accessibility policies, committees, coordinators, user testing groups, bug fix priority policies, or an automated accessibility testing program.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by e-commerce businesses that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Retailers operating online must proactively address these issues to avoid potential lawsuits, ensure equal access for all customers, and provide effective communication for individuals with visual disabilities across their digital services and physical store-related information.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online lingerie and apparel retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having improperly labeled text, cursor navigation issues, mislabeled product sizes, an unnavigable and mislabeled search bar, inaccessible shopping cart details, and a lack of confirmation for actions. The website also reportedly fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards and lacks essential accessibility policies and features.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for other online retailers, emphasizing the necessity of ADA Title III and WCAG compliance for their websites to ensure full accessibility for disabled users and avoid similar litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Lingerie and Apparel Reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer