Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online paint and supplies retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 19, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Accessibility IssuesMislabeled Logo LinkInadequate Image DescriptionsUnlabeled Price Ranges

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a federal lawsuit against an online paint and supplies retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 19, 2023. The complaint, filed by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to the inaccessibility of the retailer's website to visually disabled individuals. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses for unlawful disability discrimination.

The complaint specifically alleges that the website contains several access barriers, including improperly labeled text that screen readers spell out rather than read as a whole word, site functions (like an "order kit" button) that are inaccessible via keyboard navigation, a mislabeled logo that does not relay its purpose to screen readers, product images with inadequate descriptions that do not fully explain items, and improperly labeled price ranges, all of which prevent full and equal use by blind and visually disabled users operating screen reader software.

This legal action underscores the continuous legal risk for similar online businesses operating websites that do not comply with ADA Title III accessibility standards and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Businesses that provide public accommodations through digital platforms must ensure their websites are fully usable by individuals with visual disabilities to avoid potential lawsuits, injunctive relief, and demands for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online paint and supplies retailer accused of?

The retailer's website is accused of having improperly labeled text, inaccessible site functions when navigating with a keyboard, a mislabeled logo that confuses screen readers, product images with insufficient descriptions, and unlabeled price ranges.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the risk of legal action under ADA Title III for businesses with inaccessible websites, potentially leading to court orders for website remediation, implementation of accessibility policies, and payment of attorney's fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online paint and suppl.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer