Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fashion Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 25, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailurePoor Color Contrast

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., filed a federal complaint in the Southern District of Florida on July 25, 2023, alleging that an online fashion retailer's website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, a visually-impaired and legally blind person, requires screen-reading software to access web content and claims the e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including product images being mislabeled or described with generic links instead of meaningful descriptions (WCAG 2.1 A F65, AH71), "Pick up in Store" and "Add to Cart" features lacking focus and therefore skipping pop-up announcements, the store locator failing to announce addresses and phone numbers due to lack of focus, prices and merchandise colors being skipped or announced as numbers, input errors not being announced, and the website having poor contrast and no zoom feature. These barriers prevent effective communication and full use by screen-reader software.

This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for online retailers and businesses operating e-commerce platforms that serve as extensions or gateways to physical stores. Companies failing to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments, particularly by neglecting WCAG standards for screen reader compatibility, face potential Title III ADA litigation and demands for injunctive relief to implement comprehensive digital accessibility.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

This online fashion retailer is accused of product images being mislabeled or having generic link descriptions, "Pick up in Store" and "Add to Cart" features lacking focus, the store locator not announcing addresses or phone numbers, prices and merchandise colors being skipped or announced as numbers, input errors not being announced, poor contrast, and no zoom feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually-impaired individual, filed this lawsuit, represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online retailers and e-commerce platforms, particularly those with physical store nexus, to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual impairments and compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, or face similar injunctive relief actions.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Fashion Clothing Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer