ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fast-casual restaurant's online ordering platform
Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 2, 2023. The complaint alleges that the online ordering platform of a fast-casual restaurant chain fails to comply with ADA Title III, thereby denying visually impaired individuals equal access to its services.
The complaint details several WCAG violations, including missing labels or instructions for input fields (3.3.2), keyboard navigation failures (2.1.1) preventing operation of certain site functions, improper meaningful sequence (1.3.2) when modals are displayed, and insufficient contrast ratios (1.4.3). Specifically, issues were noted on the online ordering site regarding address, city, state, postal code, search criterion, and checkout fields, as well as the inability to close search menu suggestions and change delivery time modals. Input error identification (3.3.1) was also cited as deficient.
This litigation highlights the critical importance for all businesses operating digital platforms, especially those with an online ordering system or a direct nexus to physical public accommodations, to ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users. Failure to adhere to WCAG standards and provide auxiliary aids and services creates significant legal exposure under the Americans with Disabilities Act, risking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as potential damages for alleged trespass.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online ordering platform accused of?
The online ordering platform is accused of violations including 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, 2.1.1 Keyboard operability, 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum), 2.4.3 Focus Order, and 3.3.1 Error Identification.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, and the plaintiff is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit indicates a legal risk for businesses whose online platforms, especially those linked to physical accommodations, are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to federal lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and claims for damages under ADA Title III.