Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant and winery chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 2, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level ASC 2.4.1 Bypass BlocksSC 2.2.2 Pause Stop HideSC 2.1.1 Keyboard OperabilityForm Field Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on 11/02/2023, alleging that an online winery and restaurant operator's website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint details numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including the lack of a mechanism to bypass repeated content (Success Criterion 2.4.1), automatically playing content without user controls to pause, stop, or hide it (Success Criterion 2.2.2), and widespread failures in keyboard operability for essential links and buttons (Success Criterion 2.1.1). Furthermore, the lawsuit cites a pervasive absence of proper labels or instructions for input fields (Success Criterion 3.3.2) and inadequate error identification for user input (Success Criterion 3.3.1) across various forms on the website.

This case highlights the significant legal risk for businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites and online membership platforms, if their digital properties are not fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities who rely on screen reader software. Failure to adhere to established accessibility guidelines can lead to lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, for discriminatory practices.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online winery and restaurant accused of?

The lawsuit alleges WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks, 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide, multiple instances of 2.1.1 Keyboard operability issues, 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, and 3.3.1 Error Identification.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ARANTZA CASTRO, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case illustrates the legal risk for businesses with websites that do not meet digital accessibility standards, potentially resulting in lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, damages, and compliance with ADA Title III for disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant and winery c.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer