Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 14, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A/AA ComplianceMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityLow Color ContrastUnclear Link Purpose & Unlabeled UI Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff ENRIQUE ALVEAR, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on November 14, 2023. The complaint alleges violations of ADA Title III against an online fashion retailer, asserting that its website is not fully accessible to blind and visually disabled users who rely on screen reader software.

The lawsuit specifically identifies multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include mislabeled product images announced only as generic graphics, incorrect announcement of product prices (a range instead of distinct original and sale prices), graphic links described as having no clear purpose, unannounced error messages for invalid coupon codes, and incorrect reading of button options. Further allegations detail unlabeled product image buttons, insufficient color contrast for error messages (below 4.5:1 ratio), unannounced error suggestions, and overly verbose status messages from search fields that hinder comprehension for screen reader users.

This legal action underscores the imperative for businesses, especially those with an e-commerce platform linked to physical stores, to ensure their digital presence adheres to ADA and WCAG standards. Non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to mandate accessibility improvements, policy modifications, and the recovery of attorney's fees and litigation expenses, thereby posing significant legal and financial risks for similar enterprises.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The lawsuit alleges WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including mislabeled product images, incorrect product price announcements, graphic links lacking clear purpose, unannounced error messages and suggestions, incorrect reading of button options, unlabeled product images, insufficient color contrast for error text, and status messages that are difficult to comprehend by screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ENRIQUE ALVEAR, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for businesses operating websites that are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly those reliant on screen reader software. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can result in federal lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, modifications to website policies and features, and the recovery of attorney's fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online fashion retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer