Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a greeting card and gift retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 17, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 3.3.1 Error IdentificationWCAG 2.4.1 Bypass BlocksScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Arantza Castro, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 17, 2023, against a greeting card and gift retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible, preventing her from engaging in activities such as searching for products, signing up for special offers, and completing the checkout process, thereby denying her equal access to goods and services.

The complaint specifically details multiple WCAG violations, including missing labels or instructions for user input fields (WCAG 3.3.2), particularly in search and email sign-up forms. It also cites a pervasive lack of error identification (WCAG 3.3.1), where the e-commerce website fails to provide clear error messages for missing required information in search, billing, and shipping forms. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges a failure to provide a mechanism to bypass blocks of content repeated on multiple webpages, such as submenu items (WCAG 2.4.1).

This legal action underscores the significant risk for other online retailers whose digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses with inaccessible websites face potential federal lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and liability for the plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs, emphasizing the critical need for comprehensive digital accessibility.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online retail company accused of?

The online retail company is accused of missing labels or instructions for user input fields (WCAG 3.3.2), failing to identify input errors with clear messages (WCAG 3.3.1), and lacking a mechanism to bypass blocks of repeated content (WCAG 2.4.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Arantza Castro filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risks for online retailers that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, leading to potential lawsuits, injunctive relief, and significant legal costs under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a greeting card and gift .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer