ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Casual Pizza Chain
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, in November 2023 against a fast casual pizza chain. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to an inaccessible website, as well as a common law tort claim for trespass related to information tracking software.
The lawsuit asserts several specific WCAG violations, including inaccessible product pricing, screen reader confusion within the shopping cart where non-cart items were read aloud, improperly labeled text causing cursor skips and navigation difficulties, and improperly labeled popup windows for actions like item removal. Furthermore, the website lacked an accessible "accessibility" notice or policy, and generally failed to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, preventing visually disabled users from effectively communicating with and utilizing the digital platform.
This legal action highlights the ongoing necessity for all businesses, especially those operating public-facing websites that serve as an extension of their physical accommodations, to ensure full digital accessibility. Companies with similar online platforms face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their websites fail to integrate screen reader software effectively, include proper labeling, and provide clear accessibility information for disabled users.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this fast casual pizza chain accused of?
The fast casual pizza chain is accused of inaccessible product pricing, screen reader confusion in the shopping cart, improperly labeled text leading to cursor skips, and improperly labeled popup windows. The website also lacked an accessibility policy and failed to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
, and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for other businesses with public-facing websites, particularly those that are extensions of physical accommodations, to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III, including proper screen reader compatibility and clear accessibility policies.