Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain's online ordering platform

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 20, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt TextLack of ARIA Live Region Announcements

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online food service provider in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 20, 2023. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website, an extension and gateway to its physical restaurants, fails to provide full and equal access to visually disabled individuals.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled logo that does not relay its purpose, a lack of notifications within the shopping cart when item quantities change or items are removed, inaccessible product prices, and improperly labeled text causing navigation issues. Furthermore, the website allegedly lacks an accessibility notice or policy, and fails to implement essential accessibility practices like alt-text for graphics or full keyboard functionality.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by online businesses, particularly those with a physical nexus, if their digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III requirements. Businesses operating similar online ordering systems and informational websites must ensure their platforms are fully accessible to all users, including those with visual disabilities, to avoid costly litigation and ensure equal access to goods and services.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online food service accused of?

The online food service is accused of having a mislabeled logo, lacking shopping cart notifications for quantity changes or item removal, inaccessible product prices, and improperly labeled text that causes navigation issues for screen readers. It also lacks a clear accessibility policy or universal symbol for disabled access.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for other businesses that operate online ordering platforms or websites linked to physical establishments, emphasizing the need for robust ADA Title III compliance and adherence to WCAG standards to prevent similar accessibility lawsuits and ensure equal access for all customers.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain's onli.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer