Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Watch Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 22, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A & AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureLow Contrast TextMissing Media Alternatives

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on November 22, 2023, alleging that an online watch retailer's website discriminates against blind and visually disabled individuals in violation of ADA Title III.

The complaint details numerous Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include missing alternatives for the homepage video and unavailable media controls, unlabeled filter lists, non-sequential focus order on product pages, inaccessible "More info" buttons for keyboard-only users, automatically rotating carousels without pause/stop controls, inaccessible PDFs with skipped focus, unannounced error messages on checkout pages, unlabeled email fields, unlabeled "Close" buttons in popups, and low contrast ratios (3.2:1) for text. Additionally, unannounced error suggestions and a lack of status messages for cart updates further hinder accessibility.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses, especially e-commerce platforms, that fail to maintain ADA-compliant websites. Non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to mandate accessibility improvements, as well as demands for attorney's fees and costs, impacting companies that do not provide equal digital access to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online watch retailer accused of?

The website is alleged to have numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including missing alternatives for homepage video, unlabeled filter lists, non-sequential keyboard focus, inaccessible buttons, uncontrolled content carousels, unannounced error messages, unlabeled form fields, and low contrast text.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure e-commerce companies face under ADA Title III if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding website remediation and significant legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Watch Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer