Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 15, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAUnlabeled ControlsKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Skip LinkScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff ENRIQUE ALVEAR, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on December 15, 2023. The plaintiff alleges that a luxury apparel retailer's website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to provide full and equal access to blind and visually disabled users.

The complaint details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include unlabeled and non-functioning slider controls (Guideline 1.3.1), lack of focus movement to specific content like size charts (Guideline 1.3.2), inaccessible submenus for keyboard-only users (Guideline 2.1.1), absence of a "Skip to Main content" link (Guideline 2.4.1), non-functional links (Guideline 2.4.3), lack of focus shift and announcements for dialogs, unlabeled buttons (Guideline 3.3.2), unannounced form fields (Guideline 4.1.2), and absence of announcements or focus movement for status messages (Guideline 4.1.3).

This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by online retailers and other businesses whose digital platforms serve as extensions of physical public accommodations. Companies with inaccessible websites, especially those lacking proper screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation, face potential lawsuits for failing to provide full and equal access to disabled individuals, necessitating comprehensive ADA compliance to avoid legal challenges and ensure inclusive digital experiences.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury apparel retailer accused of?

The luxury apparel retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations including unlabeled and non-functioning slider controls, lack of focus movement on size charts, inaccessible submenus for keyboard-only users, missing "Skip to Main content" links, non-functional links, lack of focus shift/announcement for dialogs, unlabeled buttons, unannounced form fields, and absence of announcements or focus movement for status messages.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Enrique Alvear filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firms Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for online businesses, particularly those operating as extensions of physical stores, if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to adhere to WCAG standards can lead to ADA Title III lawsuits, requiring costly remediation and legal fees to ensure equal access and avoid ongoing discrimination claims.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Apparel Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer