Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 18, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A3.3.1 Error Identification2.1.1 Keyboard AccessibilityScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 18, 2023, against an online jewelry retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen reader software, alleges that the e-commerce website is inaccessible to individuals with disabilities, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A violations. These include multiple instances of 3.3.1 Error Identification where the website fails to provide error messages for missing inputs in forms such as search, adding items to a bag, claiming promo discounts, tracking orders, and booking appointments. Additionally, the lawsuit cites several 2.1.1 Keyboard failures, preventing keyboard navigation for essential functions like tracking orders and selecting options when booking an appointment on the defendant's platform.

This litigation highlights the critical legal exposure for e-commerce websites that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals using assistive technologies. Businesses operating in similar industries face the risk of lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and potential liability for damages if their websites do not comply with ADA Title III requirements for effective communication and equal access.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

The online jewelry retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including 3.3.1 Error Identification (missing error messages for various input fields) and 2.1.1 Keyboard (failure to enable keyboard navigation for key functions like tracking orders and booking appointments).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit indicates that businesses with e-commerce websites, especially those in retail, are at risk of legal action under ADA Title III if their digital platforms lack accessibility for disabled users, potentially leading to injunctions and damages for non-compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer