Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 21, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 A/AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing LabelsIncorrect Focus OrderImages of Text Accessibility

Case Summary

James Watson has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on December 21, 2023, against an online clothing retailer. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the retailer's mobile website is not fully accessible or independently usable by visually impaired consumers using screen reader software, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 A and AA guideline violations, including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to unlabeled content in size charts and column headers; Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) as product reviews are not announced; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) where submenus in the navigation are skipped; Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) as a "Get 10% off" button is unlabeled; Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) where benefits in a dialog are unannounced; and Guideline 4.1.3 (Status Messages) as the cart confirmation dialog is not announced.

This legal action highlights the ongoing necessity for online businesses, particularly e-commerce platforms and online clothing retailers, to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies with websites that serve as an extension of their public accommodations face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if they fail to implement and maintain features compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers, potentially leading to injunctive relief and the payment of attorney's fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of violating WCAG Guidelines 1.3.1 (unlabeled content), 1.3.2 (unannounced product reviews), 2.4.3 (incorrect focus order in submenus), 4.1.2 (unlabeled buttons), 1.4.5 (unannounced images of text), and 4.1.3 (unannounced status messages).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by James Watson and is represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar online businesses that their websites may be found in violation of ADA Title III if they are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially resulting in orders for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer