Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an eyewear and apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 26, 2023

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureUnlabeled Form Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a lawsuit against an eyewear and apparel retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 26, 2023. The complaint, filed by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. (and co-counsel LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.), alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to inaccessible digital platforms.

The complaint details several accessibility barriers on the defendant's e-commerce website, which prevented blind and visually disabled users from full and equal access. These violations include unlabeled website tests where the cursor skipped information, a mislabeled homepage logo, an incorrectly labeled shopping cart icon, improperly labeled product images with insufficient descriptions, and unlabeled product pricing. The absence of an accessibility notice or contact information further hindered navigation and communication.

This case underscores the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to adhere to ADA Title III requirements. Organizations, particularly those in retail with a nexus between physical and digital storefronts, must ensure their online platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face potential litigation and demands for injunctive relief and compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this eyewear and apparel retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having an unlabeled website test where the cursor skipped, a mislabeled homepage logo, an incorrectly labeled shopping cart icon, improperly labeled product images with insufficient descriptions, and unlabeled product pricing.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit indicates that businesses with websites linked to physical stores face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits for injunctive relief and compliance mandates.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an eyewear and apparel re.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer