Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an entertainment venue

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AANon-Text Content (1.1.1)Info and Relationships (1.3.1)Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2)Use of Color (1.4.1)Images of Text (1.4.5)Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against an entertainment venue in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on January 5, 2024. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and its implementing regulations.

The lawsuit specifically cites multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA guideline violations, including Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unannounced image-based content, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) and 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) due to inaccessible seating charts that lack meaningful announcements and keyboard focus, Guideline 1.4.1 (Use of Color) where color-coded availability is not communicated to screen readers, and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) for unannounced text embedded in homepage images.

This legal action underscores the significant risk faced by similar online entertainment venues, theaters, and public accommodations that maintain websites without ensuring full accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines can lead to costly litigation, injunctive relief requirements, and attorney's fees, highlighting the imperative for digital platforms to integrate accessible design from the outset.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this entertainment venue accused of?

The venue is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Guidelines 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for images lacking alternative text and accessible versions, 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) and 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) for inaccessible and poorly announced seating charts that hinder event booking, 1.4.1 (Use of Color) for relying solely on color to convey information, and 1.4.5 (Images of Text) for unannounced text within images.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other entertainment venues and public accommodations that operate websites without full ADA Title III and WCAG compliance, potentially exposing them to similar lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to make their platforms accessible, and liability for attorney's fees and litigation costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an entertainment venue. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer