Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Movie Theatre Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 18, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text ContentWCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 3.3.1 Error IdentificationWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role Value

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on January 18, 2024, against an operator of a movie theatre and entertainment center. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby discriminating against them.

The lawsuit specifically details several alleged WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations impacting screen reader users. These include failures in Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unlabeled images and buttons, Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) where content is displayed but not announced, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) on location selectors, Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) for unannounced form errors, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unlabeled logo and search buttons, Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) regarding unlabeled buttons in time selectors, and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) where promotional text in images is not announced.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating public accommodations that extend their services online. Ensuring digital platforms are compliant with WCAG standards is crucial to avoid similar litigation, as contractual arrangements with third-party vendors for inaccessible platforms do not absolve operators of their ADA obligations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this movie theatre chain accused of?

The lawsuit alleges violations including WCAG Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content), Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence), Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order), Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification), Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value), and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses with online presences, emphasizing that operators of public accommodations are responsible for ensuring their digital platforms, including mobile websites and third-party vendor platforms, comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to avoid discrimination claims.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Movie Theatre Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer