Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online beauty product retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 25, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 AAKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Order ViolationError IdentificationMissing Accessible NamesImages of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 25, 2024, against an online beauty product retailer. Represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC., the plaintiff alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen reader software.

The complaint specifically outlines several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) where screen reader users cannot use 'I'm New' or 'I'm Back' options; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) where a radio button does not receive focus or announcement; Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) where error messages are not announced; Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) where filter options are announced as "blank"; and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) where text within product images is not announced or navigable.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for companies operating e-commerce platforms that fail to provide equal access to all individuals, including those with visual disabilities. Businesses, particularly those in retail and online sales, must ensure their digital presence complies with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to avoid similar litigation and to offer an inclusive experience for all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty product retailer accused of?

This online beauty product retailer is accused of violations including Guideline 2.1.1 (Keyboard) for inaccessible 'I'm New'/'I'm Back' options, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for unannounced radio buttons, Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) for unannounced error messages, Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for unlabeled filter options, and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) for unannounced text in product images.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for online retailers and e-commerce websites regarding non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for failing to provide accessible digital services to individuals with visual impairments.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online beauty product ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer