Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a home furnishings retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 2, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

WCAG 2.1 AANon-Text Content (1.1.1)Info and Relationships (1.3.1)Focus Order (2.4.3)Link Purpose (2.4.4)NameRoleValue (4.1.2)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against a home furnishings retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on February 2, 2024. The complaint alleges that the retailer's mobile website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), denying visually impaired users full and equal access to its online services and information.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) where payment options are announced generically as "image"; Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) where sale prices are not distinctly conveyed from original prices; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) which prevents screen reader users from accessing confirmation pop-ups; Guideline 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context) citing incorrectly labeled external links that lead to unrelated third-party policies; and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) due to multiple unlabeled interactive elements such as expand buttons announced only as "image."

This case underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to provide full and equal access to visually impaired consumers. The plaintiff, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, seeks injunctive relief to compel the defendant to make its mobile website fully accessible, highlighting the necessity for online retailers to comply with ADA Title III and associated accessibility guidelines to avoid litigation and ensure inclusivity for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Guidelines 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unlabeled payment options, 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for indistinct price announcements, 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for inaccessible pop-ups, 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context) for mislabeled external links, and 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for unlabeled buttons.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm represents the plaintiff?

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, and she is represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This lawsuit highlights the risk of litigation under ADA Title III for online businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, requiring them to address specific WCAG violations and maintain accessible digital platforms to avoid legal action.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a home furnishings retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer