Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 9, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt TextMissing Form Labels/ARIA

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed a federal lawsuit against a fast food restaurant chain in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 9th, 2024. The complaint alleges that the restaurant chain's website fails to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III, thereby denying visually disabled individuals equal access to its online services and information.

The lawsuit details several specific WCAG violations, including a mislabeled logo acting as a link to the homepage where the screen reader does not relay its purpose, menu categories only accessible via mouse navigation, inaccessible restaurant location information, an inaccessible eGift cards tab and "check balance" option, improperly labeled shopping cart information (price, subtotal, order total), and an improperly labeled "Shopping Cart" link. Furthermore, an installed "accessibility" widget/plugin from a third-party vendor was found to be ineffective for screen reader users.

This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating websites that do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Companies in the fast food industry and other sectors providing online services must ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to all users, particularly those relying on screen reader software, to avoid similar litigation, injunctive relief, and the associated costs and reputational damage.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fast food restaurant chain accused of?

The fast food restaurant chain is accused of having a mislabeled logo, menu categories inaccessible via keyboard, inaccessible restaurant location information, an inaccessible eGift cards tab, improperly labeled shopping cart details (price, subtotal, order total), and an improperly labeled "Shopping Cart" link. An installed "accessibility" widget was also found to be ineffective.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for companies whose websites fail to provide equal access to individuals with visual disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and court costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Restaurant Chai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer