Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 26, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1.2 Keyboard TrapWCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard AccessibilityWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 3.3.3 Error SuggestionADA Title III Website Compliance

Case Summary

ARANTZA CASTRO has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 26, 2024, alleging that an online clothing and accessories retailer's website is not fully accessible to visually impaired users, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, who uses screen reader software, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to compel the defendant to update its digital platform to comply with accessibility standards.

The complaint outlines several specific WCAG 2.2 violations, including keyboard traps within rewards modals and review filters, inability to activate product size and sorting dropdowns via keyboard, lack of audible confirmation for adding items to a bag, blank audible labels for checkout fields like email address, incomplete audible labels for shipping options (omitting prices), and absence of audible error suggestions for incorrect credit card numbers. These barriers prevent the plaintiff from independently navigating and fully utilizing the e-commerce website.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risks for online businesses that fail to ensure their websites meet established digital accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG. Similar e-commerce platforms could face legal challenges under the ADA if their digital properties are not designed to provide equal access and effective communication for disabled individuals, leading to potential injunctions and costly remediation efforts.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of keyboard traps on modals and filters, inability to activate dropdowns and size buttons via keyboard, lack of audible confirmation for 'add to bag' actions, missing or blank audible labels on checkout forms, and no audible error suggestions for payment information.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA CASTRO filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar online retailers who may face lawsuits under ADA Title III if their websites do not comply with WCAG standards, potentially resulting in injunctions requiring website modifications and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer