Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online lingerie and beauty retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 26, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.2 Standard 2.1.2 No Keyboard TrapWCAG 2.2 Standard 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 2.2 Standard 2.1.1 KeyboardWCAG 2.2 Standard 3.3.3 Error SuggestionWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA CASTRO has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on February 26, 2024, against an online lingerie and beauty retailer. The complaint asserts that the website fails to provide equal access for visually impaired users, citing non-compliance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

The lawsuit alleges multiple WCAG violations, including keyboard traps on modals and within review filters (WCAG 2.2 Standard 2.1.2), insufficient audible labels for image buttons and shipping options, and a lack of audible confirmation for adding items to a shopping bag (WCAG 2.2 Standard 3.3.2). Further issues include the inability to activate sorting and size selection dropdowns via keyboard (WCAG 2.2 Standard 2.1.1), and missing audible error suggestions for incorrect credit card input (WCAG 2.2 Standard 3.3.3).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, particularly those relying on screen reader software for navigation and purchasing. Businesses in the e-commerce sector must prioritize digital accessibility to avoid similar litigation and ensure equal access to goods and services for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online lingerie and beauty retailer accused of?

The online lingerie and beauty retailer is accused of keyboard traps on its website's modal windows and review filters, incomplete or non-descriptive audible labels for interactive elements and shipping options, and a lack of audible confirmation for critical actions like adding items to a shopping bag. Additionally, the complaint notes inaccessible dropdowns for sorting and size selection via keyboard and missing audible error suggestions for input fields.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA CASTRO filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the significant legal imperative for all online businesses to meet web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA and higher, to prevent discrimination against disabled individuals. Failure to ensure full digital accessibility can lead to ADA Title III lawsuits and substantial legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online lingerie and be.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer