Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a shipping and printing services provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMeaningful Sequence (1.3.2)Focus Order (2.4.3)Keyboard Operability (2.1.1)Error Identification (3.3.1)

Case Summary

Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA has filed a federal lawsuit against a shipping and printing services provider in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami-Dade Division, on March 5, 2024. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to inaccessibility of the defendant's internet website for visually impaired users. Plaintiff is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

The complaint details multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including issues with "Meaningful Sequence" (1.3.2) and "Focus Order" (2.4.3) related to a GDPR modal that traps keyboard users and disrupts navigation. Other identified barriers include a lack of "Bypass Blocks" (2.4.1) for submenu items, "Keyboard" operability failures (2.1.1) for language options and search filters, and insufficient "Error Identification" (3.3.1) and "Labels or Instructions" (3.3.2) for form fields. The plaintiff alleges the e-commerce website does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses whose online platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines can lead to lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages and attorney's fees, emphasizing the critical need for comprehensive digital accessibility audits and remediation for all public-facing websites and applications.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this shipping and printing services provider accused of?

The company is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2), Focus Order (2.4.3), Bypass Blocks (2.4.1), Keyboard (2.1.1), Error Identification (3.3.1), and Labels or Instructions (3.3.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for companies with inaccessible websites, as they may face lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees for failing to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a shipping and printing s.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer