Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 22, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A Link Purpose (In Context)WCAG 2.1 A Keyboard AccessibilityWCAG 2.1 A Labels or InstructionsWCAG 2.1 A No Keyboard TrapADA Title III Website Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Arantza Espinoza has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online jewelry and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 22, 2024. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen reader software, alleges that the e-commerce website contains significant access barriers preventing full and equal use by individuals with disabilities. This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages for alleged trespass.

The complaint details several specific WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including failures in Link Purpose (In Context) for buttons such as Account, Wishlist, Cart, and Add to Wish List, making their purpose ambiguous to screen reader users. The website is also accused of Keyboard accessibility failures (2.1.1 Keyboard) for functions like searching, filtering products, specifying gift options during checkout, and selecting a date of birth during registration. Furthermore, the plaintiff alleges a lack of proper Labels or Instructions (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions) for input fields like gold type and date of birth, and a Keyboard Trap (2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap) preventing navigation past the Add to Cart button.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose digital platforms fail to meet established accessibility standards like WCAG. Businesses operating e-commerce websites must ensure their platforms are fully navigable and comprehensible for all users, including those with visual impairments who rely on assistive technologies. Failure to address these common accessibility barriers can lead to similar litigation and the requirement for costly injunctive relief and modifications.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry and accessories retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including Link Purpose (In Context) failures, Keyboard accessibility issues, inadequate Labels or Instructions for input fields, and a Keyboard Trap preventing navigation.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Arantza Espinoza, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates legal risk for similar businesses that operate websites or digital platforms that are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to ADA Title III litigation, injunctive relief, and compensatory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry and acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer