Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Beverage Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 22, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.2 Level AMissing Audible LabelsNo Audible Confirmation for User ActionsInaccessible Error SuggestionsScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on March 22, 2024. The complaint targets an online beverage retailer, alleging violations of ADA Title III due to the inaccessibility of its website to visually impaired users.

The lawsuit specifically details multiple WCAG 2.2 Level A violations. These include instances where links within various carousels on the homepage have blank audible labels, preventing screen readers from conveying their purpose. Additionally, the website is cited for a lack of audible confirmation when users activate options on product detail pages (such as selecting a 'Bottle' option or increasing 'Quantity') and within modals (like choosing a 'Today' delivery date). Critical accessibility failures also involve error suggestion deficiencies, where incomplete phone numbers, incorrect credit card numbers, or incorrect gift card numbers do not trigger audibly rendered error messages or provide meaningful audible feedback, hindering effective communication for disabled users.

This legal action underscores the significant legal risks faced by online businesses, particularly those in the retail sector, if their digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to all individuals, including those with visual disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to costly litigation, requiring extensive website remediation, implementation of accessibility policies, and potential damages, emphasizing the necessity for proactive digital accessibility measures.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beverage retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.2 Level A violations, including missing or blank audible labels for links, a lack of audible confirmation for user actions like button activations, and inaccessible error suggestions for form inputs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses if their websites are not accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to litigation, court-ordered remediation, and damages under ADA Title III for non-compliance with WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Beverage Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer