Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 28, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A Non-Text ContentWCAG 2.1 A Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.1 A Meaningful SequenceWCAG 2.1 A Focus OrderWCAG 2.1 AA Images of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff OSCAR HERRERA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit against an online apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 28, 2024. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to the inaccessibility of the e-commerce website to blind and visually disabled users. The plaintiff, who uses screen reader software, asserts that the website's barriers prevent him from accessing and enjoying the retailer's online and physical store offerings.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including unannounced five-star graphics (Non-Text Content), unlabeled product prices in cart popups with incorrect announcements for strikethrough prices (Info and Relationships), a lack of proper announcement for "Order Summary" contents on the checkout page causing focus shifts (Meaningful Sequence), an absence of controls for promotional carousels that interrupt screen reader focus (Pause, Stop, Hide), incorrect focus order when popups appear (Focus Order), shoe size guide content not announced as a table with missing labels (Labels or Instructions), and unannounced text information in countdown timers (Images of Text).

This legal action underscores the imperative for online businesses, particularly those with a nexus to physical public accommodations, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III. Companies with similar accessibility shortcomings on their e-commerce websites face potential lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate barriers, and compensatory damages, as well as requirements for implementing web accessibility policies and ongoing monitoring.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG violations including unannounced five-star graphics (Non-Text Content), unlabeled product prices in cart popups with incorrect announcements (Info and Relationships), lack of meaningful sequence for content like the "Order Summary" (Meaningful Sequence), no controls for promotional carousels (Pause, Stop, Hide), incorrect focus order for popups (Focus Order), unannounced table structure in a shoe size guide (Labels or Instructions), and unannounced text in countdown timers (Images of Text).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

OSCAR HERRERA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risk for online businesses that fail to provide accessible digital platforms under ADA Title III, potentially leading to injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and requirements for ongoing accessibility monitoring and training.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer