Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant group

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 5, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA ComplianceUnlabeled UI Elements (1.3.1)Keyboard Navigation Traps (2.1.1)Auto-Playing Carousel Controls (2.2.2)Generic Link Descriptions (3.3.2)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Oscar Herrera, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on April 5, 2024, against a hospitality company operating multiple restaurants. The complaint alleges that the restaurant group's website is not fully accessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including unlabeled elements announced as "blank" (Version A Guideline 1.3.1), an inaccessible date picker that was not announced and could not be navigated by screen readers (Version A Guideline 1.3.2), keyboard navigation failures preventing access to menu content and skipping to footer links (Version A Guideline 2.1.1), continuous announcements from a homepage carousel without a discoverable pause button (Version A Guideline 2.2.2), and a lack of "External Link" announcements for third-party websites (Version A Guideline 2.4.4). Additionally, incorrectly labeled elements, such as the Instagram link, were announced generically, hindering understanding (Version A Guideline 3.3.2).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for hospitality and e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible. Businesses with similar online reservation and gift card sales functionalities must ensure compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines to avoid potential lawsuits, injunctive relief, and the associated costs of remediation and legal fees. The case underscores the importance of proactive accessibility audits and policies to prevent discrimination against visually impaired users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant group accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including unlabeled elements (WCAG 1.3.1), an inaccessible date picker (WCAG 1.3.2), keyboard navigation failures (WCAG 2.1.1), problematic homepage carousels (WCAG 2.2.2), missing "External Link" announcements (WCAG 2.4.4), and incorrectly labeled elements (WCAG 3.3.2).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case exposes businesses, particularly those in the hospitality and restaurant industry with online presence, to legal risks under ADA Title III if their websites are not accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, requiring potential injunctive relief, policy changes, and accessibility remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant group. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer