Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Gym Membership Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 30, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.2 ALabels or Instructions (3.3.2)Error Suggestion (3.3.3)Keyboard (2.1.1)Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 12, 2024, alleging that an online gym membership retailer's website contains barriers preventing full access for visually impaired users under ADA Title III.

The complaint details several WCAG violations, including inaccessible audible labels for banners, language selection dropdowns, and checkboxes (WCAG 3.3.2), and a lack of audible error suggestions for incorrect promo codes, un-checked required boxes, and mismatched passwords (WCAG 3.3.3). Additionally, critical functionality like the "Stay updated on club news!" checkbox, payment method radial buttons, and the "I agree to the Membership Terms & Conditions" checkbox are not operable via keyboard (WCAG 2.1.1).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites or digital platforms that fail to adhere to WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, and compensatory damages, to ensure equal access for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online gym membership retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of multiple WCAG 2.2 Level A violations, including missing or blank audible labels (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions) for banners, language selection, and checkboxes. There are also allegations of errors not being audibly suggested (3.3.3 Error Suggestion) for promo codes, required checkboxes, and password mismatches. Furthermore, the website fails keyboard operability (2.1.1 Keyboard) for several interactive elements like checkboxes and radial buttons during the membership purchase process.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, and he is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk faced by online businesses that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can result in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to mandate accessibility improvements, as well as demands for attorney's fees, costs, and compensatory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Gym Membership Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer