Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: National Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 13, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Compliance FailureNon-Descriptive Link TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III digital accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 13, 2024. The complaint targets a foreign for-profit corporation operating a chain of restaurants, alleging its website contains barriers that prevent blind and visually disabled users from full and equal access, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically alleges numerous WCAG violations, including improperly labeled text causing screen reader cursor skips, a mislabeled logo that does not convey its navigation purpose, inaccessible contact information due to a lack of description and screen reader integration, and social media and ordering links with non-descriptive alternate text that screen readers interpret only as "link." The plaintiff also claims the site fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards and that a linked "accessibility" statement was also inaccessible.

This litigation highlights the critical legal risk for businesses, particularly those with a nexus between their online platforms and physical locations, if their websites fail to comply with ADA Title III and established web accessibility guidelines. Entities with similar e-commerce functionalities must ensure their digital presence is fully accessible to all users to avoid potential lawsuits for discrimination and ensure effective communication.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this national restaurant chain accused of?

The national restaurant chain is accused of having improperly labeled text that causes screen reader cursor skips, a mislabeled logo, inaccessible contact information due to poor screen reader integration, and social media and ordering links with non-descriptive text, among other issues that prevent the website from meeting WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses operating similar e-commerce platforms and physical locations, underscoring the necessity of ensuring their websites provide full and equal access to all disabled users to comply with ADA Title III and avoid potential litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: National Restaurant Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer