ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury goods retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC; Adams & Associates, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff ARANTZA ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online luxury goods retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on May 15, 2024.
The complaint alleges several specific WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including 3.3.1 Error Identification for missing error messages on the search form and store locator, 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) due to unclear link labels for product color modals, and 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions for unlabeled input fields in product color options and boutique selection. Further issues include 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide, as a hero banner animation plays automatically without controls, and 2.1.1 Keyboard violations where 'Add product to bag' and 'Advisor Phone number' links are not keyboard operable.
This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers whose digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to disabled users under ADA Title III. Businesses operating e-commerce websites must ensure their platforms are comprehensively accessible to screen reader software and keyboard navigation to avoid potential litigation, injunctive relief, and compensatory damages.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury goods retailer accused of?
This online luxury goods retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including 3.3.1 Error Identification, 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context), 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide, and 2.1.1 Keyboard accessibility failures.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by ARANTZA ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case illustrates that businesses must ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, particularly those using screen reader software, to avoid ADA Title III litigation, potential injunctive relief, and claims for damages for alleged digital trespass and discrimination.