Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sunglasses retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 21, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AA3.3.1 Error Identification2.1.1 Keyboard Operability2.4.3 Focus Order1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit on May 21, 2024, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, against an online sunglasses retailer.

The complaint alleges multiple WCAG violations, including Error Identification (3.3.1) for login, password reset, and account creation forms that fail to notify users of input errors, and for a store locator form lacking postal code error messages. Further violations include Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2) and Focus Order (2.4.3) issues with a persistent 'Unlock 10% Off' modal, Contrast (Minimum) (1.4.3) for unreadable content behind the modal, and Keyboard (2.1.1) failures preventing operation of product filters, a 'Call Us' button, and an 'Add to Bag' button, denying access to essential functions for disabled users.

This case highlights the legal imperative for e-commerce platforms to implement robust digital accessibility features, as non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Businesses offering online goods and services are at risk of similar litigation if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities who rely on assistive technologies.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online sunglasses retailer accused of?

The online sunglasses retailer is accused of WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification for various forms, 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence and 2.4.3 Focus Order issues with a pop-up modal, 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) for obscured content, and 2.1.1 Keyboard failures for navigation and transactional elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for e-commerce websites and online retailers that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits for injunctive relief, damages, and legal fees under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sunglasses reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer