Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 10, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 3.3.1 Error IdentificationWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard OperabilityScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online clothing retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 10, 2024. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses NVDA screen reader software, alleges that the e-commerce website contains access barriers that prevent full and free use by blind and visually disabled individuals.

The complaint details multiple WCAG violations, including failures to identify errors (WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification) when users do not input required information for sign-in, account creation, newsletter sign-up, password recovery, or during the checkout process for discount codes and credit card details. Additionally, the lawsuit cites insufficient labels or instructions (WCAG 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions) for color, size, and quantity input fields when adding items to the cart, and a lack of keyboard operability (WCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard) for the size chart link, rendering parts of the website unusable with assistive technology. The plaintiff also notes the ineffectiveness of the website's accessibility statement and widget.

This legal action underscores the significant legal risk for e-commerce businesses that operate websites not fully compliant with WCAG standards, particularly for visually disabled users. Failure to provide effective communication and equal access can result in federal lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees under ADA Title III.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification failures for missing input fields, WCAG 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions deficiencies for product selectors, and WCAG 2.1.1 Keyboard operability issues for the size chart link, among others.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firms?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for e-commerce websites if they fail to provide an accessible online experience, particularly regarding error identification, proper labeling, and keyboard navigation, leading to potential ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer