Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sportswear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 18, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Headings and LabelsInsufficient Color Contrast

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 18, 2024, against an online sportswear retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses NVDA screen reader software, alleges that the company's website contains numerous access barriers that prevent him from fully and effectively using its services.

The complaint specifically details multiple WCAG 2.1 violations, including issues with Keyboard operability (2.1.1), No Keyboard Trap (2.1.2), Headings and Labels (2.4.6), Link Purpose (In Context) (2.4.4), Bypass Blocks (2.4.1), Error Identification (3.3.1), Meaningful Sequence (1.3.2), Contrast (Minimum) (1.4.3), and Focus Order (2.4.3). These barriers, which the plaintiff encountered while attempting to browse merchandise and make purchases, render the website inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users.

This legal action underscores the ongoing importance for businesses operating e-commerce platforms to ensure their digital presence is fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, in compliance with ADA Title III. The allegations highlight the potential for significant legal exposure for similar online retailers if their websites fail to meet established web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1 Level AA, impacting their ability to serve all customers equally.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online sportswear retailer accused of?

The online sportswear retailer is accused of violations including WCAG 2.1 success criteria 2.1.1 (Keyboard), 2.1.2 (No Keyboard Trap), 2.4.6 (Headings and Labels), 2.4.4 (Link Purpose), 2.4.1 (Bypass Blocks), 3.3.1 (Error Identification), 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence), 1.4.3 (Contrast), and 2.4.3 (Focus Order).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online sportswear retailers and similar e-commerce businesses that may also have websites with accessibility barriers, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and damages if their platforms are not fully usable by disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sportswear reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer