Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 18, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level AWCAG 2.1 Level AAKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInvisible Focus Indicators

Case Summary

Oscar Herrera has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on June 18, 2024. The plaintiff, who is blind, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing him and other visually disabled individuals from fully accessing its content and services. This case also includes a common law tort claim for trespass, alleging the website's use of tracking software on the plaintiff's computer without consent.

The complaint details a variety of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include issues with information and relationships (e.g., unlabeled 'Order Summary' sections, incorrect announcements for product options), meaningful sequence (disappearing focus indicators, hidden buttons), keyboard accessibility (unfocusable 'View as: Grid' and 'Inspiration' buttons), and focus order (skipped interactive elements). Further allegations cover error identification (unannounced login errors), labels or instructions (incorrect button state announcements), headings and labels (unlabeled buttons), focus visibility (invisible keyboard focus), error suggestion (unannounced error messages), and status messages (unannounced item unavailability). These barriers cumulatively render the e-commerce website inaccessible to screen reader users.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, underscoring the necessity for robust web accessibility policies and continuous remediation efforts to avoid similar litigation. Businesses are urged to adopt and implement comprehensive web accessibility standards to prevent discrimination and ensure full and equal access to all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include failures in information and relationships (unlabeled sections, incorrect announcements), meaningful sequence, keyboard accessibility (unfocusable buttons), focus order (skipped elements), error identification (unannounced errors), labels or instructions (incorrect button state announcements), headings and labels (unlabeled buttons), focus visibility (invisible focus indicators), error suggestion (unannounced error messages), and status messages (unannounced item unavailability).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Oscar Herrera filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and co-counsel LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a significant legal risk for other e-commerce businesses, emphasizing the need for their websites to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to prevent similar claims of disability discrimination and ensure equal access for all users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer