Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online suit and apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 25, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 1.1.1 Non-text ContentWCAG 2.1.1 KeyboardWCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification

Case Summary

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, filed a federal lawsuit against an online suit and apparel retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 25, 2024. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website, which functions as an extension of physical retail stores, fails to provide equal access to visually impaired individuals under ADA Title III.

The lawsuit specifies numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including issues with meaningful sequence (1.3.2), focus order (2.4.3), non-text content (1.1.1), keyboard operability (2.1.1), information and relationships (1.3.1), link purpose (2.4.4), bypass blocks (2.4.1), labels or instructions (3.3.2), and error identification (3.3.1). Additionally, a WCAG 2.1 Level AA violation for status messages (4.1.3) is cited, all of which render the website inaccessible to screen reader software users.

This litigation highlights the ongoing legal imperative for online retailers and public accommodations to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses that do not adhere to WCAG standards face the risk of similar lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and the necessity to implement comprehensive web accessibility policies, audits, and alternative communication methods to avoid discrimination.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online suit and apparel retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Level A violations including meaningful sequence (1.3.2), focus order (2.4.3), non-text content (1.1.1), keyboard operability (2.1.1), information and relationships (1.3.1), link purpose (2.4.4), bypass blocks (2.4.1), labels or instructions (3.3.2), and error identification (3.3.1), along with WCAG 2.1 Level AA status messages (4.1.3).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online retailers who do not ensure their websites are fully accessible under ADA Title III, potentially leading to similar lawsuits and demands for comprehensive accessibility remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online suit and appare.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer