Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Swimwear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 2, 2024

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1Keyboard AccessibilityError IdentificationMeaningful SequenceContrast (Minimum)

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on July 2, 2024, alleging that an online clothing and swimwear retailer's e-commerce website violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III by failing to provide equal access to visually disabled users.

The complaint outlines several WCAG 2.1 accessibility violations, including multiple instances of keyboard operability failure for login and help dropdowns, and issues with error identification where no error messages are displayed for missing input fields like size, card number, expiry date, CVC/CVV, and cardholder name during checkout. Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges problems with meaningful sequence due to a non-closable shopping bag modal that allows users to navigate the entire site without closing it, and a contrast issue where content behind the shopping bag popup is not visible due to insufficient contrast.

This legal action underscores the ongoing risk for e-commerce websites and other digital platforms that do not adhere to ADA Title III requirements and WCAG standards. Businesses operating similar online services should proactively audit and remediate accessibility barriers to avoid potential litigation and ensure full and equal access for all users, including those with visual disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and swimwear retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Keyboard operability failures for dropdowns, lack of Error Identification messages for essential input fields, issues with Meaningful Sequence due to a persistent shopping bag modal, and insufficient Contrast for content displayed behind popups.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, and is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar e-commerce websites and digital platforms that fail to implement WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards, particularly concerning keyboard navigation, error notifications, logical content sequencing, and minimum contrast requirements, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Sw.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer